Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work
Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work
Blog Article
In addition to your primary punishment, the court could also impose a fine on the offender. The fine’s amount is in the discretion in the court and is meant to function an additional deterrent.
Online access to civil and criminal cases in find circuit courts. Cases can be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court might interfere with the summary or the finding and mold the relief to make it correct for the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision from the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” usually are not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. If your appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 times for your department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we're guided via the decision of the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there can be one particular or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason to the decision with the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted within an argument.
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge to your Judgment within time. Read more
Section 302 of your PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic on the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station resulting from potential health risks and hazards.
In a few jurisdictions, case regulation is usually applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion of the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to some healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions within the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental regulation in Pakistan, it really is important that the case founded the application from click here the precautionary principle where there is a risk to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations from the State in protecting the right to the clean and healthy environment.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and regarded researchers to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.